Musescore Evolution 3.7 Cross-Staff Notation Problem
OS: Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601: SP 1), Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (64-bit): 3.7.0.14952198358
Cross staff notation with Musescore 3.7 produces a rather odd result
Same thing in Musescore 3.6.2 is correct (aside from a bit of manual repositioning)
https://github.com/Jojo-Schmitz/MuseScore/issues/932
Comments
Would be wonderful if you (or someone else) couzld find out since when that is the case
In reply to Would be wonderful if you … by Jojo-Schmitz
I'll try some older versions of 3.7
In reply to I'll try some older versions… by rothers
The oldest I have is
OS: Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601: SP 1), Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (64-bit): 3.7.0.13258075422
That still has the problem.
In reply to The oldest I have is OS:… by rothers
Rather already than stil ;-)
But thanks!
In reply to The oldest I have is OS:… by rothers
Actually can you rell the commit SHA of these? Copy/Paste from the Help > About dialog's notice icon
In reply to The oldest I have is OS:… by rothers
OS: Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601: SP 1), Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (64-bit): 3.7.0.13258075422, revision: f0be61c
Not OK
In reply to Would be wonderful if you … by Jojo-Schmitz
Is ok in OS: Windows 7 SP 1 (6.1), Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (32-bit): 3.7.0.14494473934, revision: 89bb902
![ScreenShot 412.png]( "ScreenShot 412.png")
In reply to Is ok in OS: Windows 7 SP 1 … by HildeK
Not ok in 3.7.0.1495,
Ok in 3.7.0.1449,
Not ok in 3.7.0.1325 ?
It depends from other things ...
In reply to Not ok in 3.7.0.1495, Ok in… by HildeK
Those numbers don't mean a thing to me :-(
I'd need commit SHAs
In reply to Those numbers don#t mean a… by Jojo-Schmitz
I don't know what SHAs is.
Besides, these were the abbreviations of the above.
In reply to I don't know what SHAs is… by HildeK
SHAs are what's after the "revision:", directly points to the corresponding commit on GitHub
The long number after the version "3.7.0." is just noise basically, some GitHub CI internal build number
In reply to SHAs are what'd after the … by Jojo-Schmitz
Thanks.
But you can see the SHAs in the post above. I've just abbreviated them so I don't have to write as much ...
In reply to Thanks. But you can see the… by HildeK
Those ain't SHAs but build numbers (and you can't shorten SHAs to shorter than 7 digits)
In reply to Not ok in 3.7.0.1495, Ok in… by HildeK
Yes, it depends on the measures in this system. If they are too tight, there will be this error.
![ScreenShot 413.png]( "ScreenShot 413.png")
In reply to Yes, it depends on the… by HildeK
So it isn't OK with that commit you earlier claimed it to be OK with, right?
In reply to So it isn't OK with that… by Jojo-Schmitz
Yes, because it depends on the next thing: how densely compressed the measures are!
![ScreenShot 414 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png]( "ScreenShot 414 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png")
![ScreenShot 415 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png]( "ScreenShot 415 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png")
![ScreenShot 416 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png]( "ScreenShot 416 MuseScore 3 Evolution_ Untitled_.png")
See here:
In reply to Not ok in 3.7.0.1495, Ok in… by HildeK
Seems to depend on if a note or rest proceeds the cross-staff.
OS: Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601: SP 1), Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (64-bit): 3.7.0.14952198358, revision: e3c89a0
I get
![cross-staff3.7_2.png]( "cross-staff3.7_2.png")
I can correct it by dragging the middle C to the right but it's still not positioned quite right to the following rest (too close).
In reply to Seems to depend on if a note… by rothers
It's as HildeK says, increase the width of the bar and it corrects itself. Almost as if the cross-staff isn't claiming it's required space.
In reply to It's as HildeK says,… by rothers
You must not go so far with the Decrease Layout Stretch in the software that the two notes are on top of each other. This happens and because one stem points downwards and one upwards, there is an overlap.
You have to keep the beat ...
In reply to You must not go so far with… by HildeK
What I've shown above is with the default layout, no shrink.
In reply to What I've shown above is… by rothers
The (or at least a) difference is: 3.6.2 (and 4.5.2) in that sample case fits 15 measures into a system, 3.7 fits 16 measures into one system
In reply to The (or at least a)… by Jojo-Schmitz
However, if you use system breaks, you must set them at least at measure 8 or 9!
At least in my environment and with this file and in 3.7.
You must give two consecutive notes a minimum interval of two eighths, even with cross staff notation, not zero!
In reply to Is ok in OS: Windows 7 SP 1 … by HildeK
So that 89bb902 is relatively recent, just a month ago, Much better than having to bisect some 1200 commits
But see furter up: this might not be it