rit. and accelerando
musescore needs rit. (i don't know how to spell the whole thing) and accelerando (i mean like the rit. where it means means to slow down to a slower speed)
musescore needs rit. (i don't know how to spell the whole thing) and accelerando (i mean like the rit. where it means means to slow down to a slower speed)
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
This can be done by selecting the desired note and entering your ritardando or accelerando as text over/under the note. The only downside with MuseScore on this aspect is that entering such things in do not have any effect on playback. However, this is understandable when one realizes that you could legitimately input many different things in there to define the music (ie. piu mosso, rubato, accelerando, tranquillo). All describe how the music ought to be played, however, to teach a software to recognize and accurately play back virtually anything you could write in, well, it speaks for itself...
In reply to This can be done by selecting by rj45
What you can also do is put the tempo markings on as many notes as you can, make each slower than the other, make all the tempo markings the color white, and then put a text box that says rit.
In reply to What you can also do is put by Matthew LeFebvre
Actually, no need to color them white. Just make them invisible using the checkbox in the Inspector, or by pressing [V]. They'll show gray on screen, so you know they're there, but they won't print or appear in PDFs.
By the way, see also https://musescore.org/en/handbook/tempo-0#ritardando-accelerando —basically the same thing you just said.
In reply to Actually, no need to color by Isaac Weiss
And that technique is now available as a basic plugin: https://musescore.org/en/project/tempochanges
In reply to And that technique is now by jeetee
I think that deserves mention in the Handbook.
In reply to I think that deserves mention by Isaac Weiss
I think that deserves the Nobel prize for music! Excellent plugin!
In reply to I think that deserves mention by Isaac Weiss
Thank you for the kind recommendation. However I'll leave the 'honors' of adding it to the handbook to you if that should be the course of action.
Also: it feels slightly arrogant to promote my own plugin into the handbook in the first place :-)
In reply to Thank you for the kind by jeetee
Actually, I added it even before I wrote that it seemed like a good idea. Check it out: https://musescore.org/en/handbook/tempo-0#ritardando-accelerando ;-)
In reply to And that technique is now by jeetee
*Adding to my question to refer back later. Thank you for this plugin.
In reply to And that technique is now by jeetee
Literally works perfectly thank you thank you thank you!!!
In reply to And that technique is now by jeetee
This is amazing, it works perfectly. You should see if you can get it to do an easy fermata! Seems like you could take a very similar approach.
In reply to This is amazing, it works… by gprayback
Can you clarify what you mean by "an easy fermata"?
Fermata in MuseScore is already functional as soon as you set it's stretch property.
In reply to And that technique is now by jeetee
Nicely done
In reply to Actually, no need to color by Isaac Weiss
Great Input!
In reply to Actually, no need to color by Isaac Weiss
press F8 to get the inspector
In reply to What you can also do is put by Matthew LeFebvre
no u
In reply to This can be done by selecting by rj45
Thanks!
In reply to This can be done by selecting by rj45
You don't need to "teach" software to recognize "virtually anything" only things that it probably should recognize. "rit." is ubiquitous, and not difficult to define programmatically (which the plugin does, technically). If you type "rit." into an expression field in Finale, it recognizes it and slows down the playback gradually, then somewhere later you type "a tempo" it returns to the original, as you might expect. If you type "ad libitum" it doesn't do anything. But there's no reason why it couldn't recognize "ad libitum", just let the user define the tempo changes similar to how the plugin does it.
In reply to You don't need to "teach"… by d_us_vb
Your Pull Request with code for that is more than welcome.
"not difficult to define programmatically" is often a way to describe work to be done by others...
In reply to Your Pull Request with code… by Jojo-Schmitz
It's been done before though, and the idea of a rit is a simple thing. changing tempo over time. the falloff can be defined by a curve, linear, exponential, etc. This isn't really a new concept in the field of programming.
In reply to It's been done before though… by seanlleblanc
I'm looking forward to your pull request.
In reply to It's been done before though… by seanlleblanc
Indeed possible, Just needs someone to do it. Be our guest.
In reply to It's been done before though… by seanlleblanc
FWIW, the coding would indeed be relatively simple, but defining the UI for how the dialog should look - what kind of controls it should contains regard to the curves etc - is the trickier part. There was a partial design done for this as part of the Google Summer of Code this year. Not sure how far it progressed though.
If you really want to hear a ritardando or accelerando in MuseScore, you can do a workaround to make it happen. Whenever you want a ritarardando for example, select a note at the beginning of the retard, then put in a tempo text and set the speed to be a little slower than the established tempo. Then select another note a few down (depending on how long your ritard is), add another tempo text that's slower, and keep repeating the process to get the speed down. You can then set those extra tempos to invisible so they don't show up in printing or even on the screen if you uncheck "Show Invisible." Accelerandos can be achieved the same way.
In reply to Playback by newsome
This is a few measures of example of how I created a ritardando at the end using tempo text. It's not ideal, but it does give me lots of flexibility in creating the ritard. I intentionally left the tempo texts visible so you could see them, but I would right-click on the them and set them to invisible before printing.
The speeds are:
Moderato (beginning) is 112
Andante is 96
Maestoso is 72
Ballad is 60
Grave is 48
In reply to Example by newsome
windows is not letting me open your file it says it needs to find the appropriate program to open it....but your'e not the only one i'm trying to solve this issue with another song i'm trying to download...but thanks for the explanation anyway
In reply to windows is not letting me by Cortney M
So just save the file and then open it directly from MuseScore. But it sounds like you also need to tell Windows to use MuseScore to open mscz files by default. The dialog that comes up asking you what program you want to use hould provide that option, or if not you get it by right clicking an mscz file form Windows Explorer and choosing "open with..." and then "choose default program". At least, those are the steps on Vista.
In reply to So just save the file and by Marc Sabatella
do you know the steps for xp? because i cant seem to figure out how to open them when the box that says "windows needs to find the appropriate program to open this file" but i have saved it but it's not in my musescore song list
In reply to do you know the steps for xp? by Cortney M
I would also try the second method i mentioned (right clicking from Explorer). If you can't get that to work, though, you might try a general Windows forum - this really isn't MuseScore-specific. Still, even without that, you should be able to pen it directly from MuseScore. Just do File->Open then browse to the folder where you saved it to. That assumes, of course, that you know where you saved it to, but presumably whatever browser you use gives you the option to save files wherever you want.
In reply to I would also try the second by Marc Sabatella
well a while ago (i had posted a problem about not being able to download other people's songs) i was told i might have downloaded it in the wrong place so i'm redownloading it right now
In reply to Example by newsome
Hi Your workaround for rits and accel is just fab. Just like Homer S. I would never have thought of that. Doh!
In reply to Example by newsome
a better alternative than THAT. I do what you said, with the diminishing tempos, but I then double-click the tempo text, and backspace it totally. The tempo still changes, but you don't see the text. you can make the "rit." or "accel." on the bottom if you wish also.
In reply to a better alternative than by peterman
Hmm, what version of MuseScore are you using? In the current version (2.0.2) deleting all the text from a tempo marking also deletes the tempo marking itself. But markings - text and otherwise - can be hidden by simply pressing "V". They will appear greyed out on screen unless you turn off the View / Show Invisible, but they won't print in any case.
In reply to Playback by newsome
i will try that thanks
In reply to Playback by newsome
, very much :)
In reply to Playback by newsome
Hi, does your workaround work on 2.0? I used to use that workaround, and had thought it was part of the program. Now I can't seem to make it work. Any new discoveries?
In reply to Hi, does your workaround by Stefanokud
Can you be more specific? What exactly are you trying to do, what are you expecting to see happen, and what happens instead? Can you post the score you are having trouble with?
I was looking for retardando yesterday! If/when you want to implement it, I think there are four key points that need to be taken into account:
- start point of rit
- end point of rit
- speed at end
(- speed at beginning is already known)
But again, thanks for a fantastic piece of software nonetheless!
In reply to Agreed! by amilardovic
i totally agree
In reply to i totally agree by Cortney M
, and another request on the same issue, http://musescore.org/en/node/6648
Saludos!
Select to create text, tempo while a note is selected, choose a tempo that you would not use during the piece. You can set it to any bpm you would like, and then delete the name. When you choose "ok" you assign that tempo to the note and those that follow, but you add no text to the score. Score!
Then I repeated the procedure each measure with a smaller bpm. It wasn't a smooth ritard, but it sufficed.
In reply to You can also by knightm7
That's a bit cumbersome, but yes, I've done that a few times. Not smooth, but no one is going to hear the MuseScore performance. ;-)
Thank you for making our lifes easier. Your score demonstrated ritarando very well.
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/tempo-0
Here's the link to the page that explains how to create a ritardando, just scroll down.
works for me without plugins?
In reply to works for me without plugins? by ItsAlexHere
12 years later and in Mu4...
In reply to works for me without plugins? by ItsAlexHere
My man has been around for 2 weeks 😭