Audio Sources/Custom Audio for existing scores

• Sep 5, 2018 - 06:00

I posted this as a Improving MuseScore.com discussion, but I'll post it here too because it applies to both.
Currently, if you want to have custom audio for your score, you have to upload the score from the MuseScore app with that option selected, or you can take an existing score and use a YouTube link as the audio source.
If you don't want to delete and re-upload a score (losing all views, favorites and comments on the score) and still want custom audio you will need to export the score as an MP3 file which you must then put in an MP4 file. This file must then be uploaded to YouTube, after which you may finally use it as an audio source for a current score.
A way that could exist in theory is to upload a private score and use the MuseScore website's "Send to YouTube" option and use that as your audio source for the existing score, however, when MuseScore sends to YouTube, it only takes the MIDI data of the score and uses it's own soundfonts to generate the music in the video.

How to fix these issues:
1. When giving users the option for audio sources for their existing scores, give them the option to upload an MP3 file.
This seems like it's a good middle ground because the MuseScore application is perfectly capable of giving the user an MP3 file of their score with their soundfonts, and the MuseScore website is clearly capable of putting an MP3 as the audio source for a score (considering downloading the score's MP3 is an option)
2. When uploading your scores with custom audio from MuseScore to YouTube have it upload using their custom audio.
3. Let users of the MuseScore application update scores from the application itself.
This is currently possible if and only if you initially uploaded the score from the application itself. If you uploaded a score through the website, you will not be able to update the score using the application.
You could have the MuseScore application "fetch" the scores that the user currently has uploaded, or you could have make the users provide the link to the score they would like to update (have the application check that the link's score is from the user currently logged in so users can't change other users' scores).

This issue has been on my mind for quite some time hence the length and detail. If you read all the way through, I'm glad someone other than me at least knows.


Comments

3. Let users of the MuseScore application update scores from the application itself.
This is currently possible if and only if you initially uploaded the score from the application itself. If you uploaded a score through the website, you will not be able to update the score using the application.

You can update a score from within the program even if it was uploaded through the site first.
The easiest option is to simply download the score first, then edit and save online that one.
The other option is to enter the correct score url under File → Score Properties → source in the form of http://musescore.com/user/scores/score_number

This makes your point 1 and 2 obsolete; but just for completeness sake:
1. upload custom mp3's
A very bad idea in my opinion. Nothing guarantees you that the mp3 uploaded is actually of the score.

2. have musescore.com send-to-youtube with the correct sounds
That would require musescore.com to actually have access to the correct sounds/soundfonts. Aside from the legalities in having to have these soundfonts on the server, the storage capacity would increase with an extreme factor per score; as there exists a gazillion soundfonts out there.

In reply to by jeetee

Thank you for your response as I wasn't aware that the option to use the scores url as a source was an option, however, you have misinterpreted the other two options I mentioned.
When you choose your audio sources (the only choice being from YouTube) nothing gurantees that your choice is your score either. The responsibility is up to the user.
As for MuseScore sending to YouTube using the rights sounds means they use whatever MP3 the score was uploaded with, not that MuseScore accommodate all soundfonts.

In reply to by Billy Pan

Old thread, topic still alive. Totally agree Billy that having to use youtube is not better than being able to upload an mp3. I guess the real reason is that the second option would take up lots of hard drive space and extra network traffic on the side of musescore and they do not like that very much..

In reply to by Massimo_73

They already generate and store an mp3 of your score on the servers, so that's not the issue.
On the other hand, allowing random mp3 uploads alongside a score does come with a big fat copyright issue; which in the current system is offloaded onto YouTube.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.