In page settings, you have to keep adjusting it incrimentaly until you get something that may or may not fill the page neatly, which I find a little tedious. Same with style/page. It would be nice if there was a "fit to page(s)" function. Thanks.
Score and part layout usually requires a number of compromises, including for example juggling settings to a) evenly space measures and systems, b) avoid awkward page turns, c) avoid "orphan" measures at the start or end of repeats, d) avoid a marking below one system forcing a wide distance to avoid a marking above the next system, e) minimise the number of pages, f) maintain legibility. Often only some of those objectives can be realised and deciding which ones have to give is a matter of context and taste. Automating the decisions will be difficult to say the least and the results unlikely to be to everyone's taste.
> It would be nice if there was a "fit to page(s)" function.
Is there a similar function in a word processing program, for example? No! What do you do there then?
You change the font size. Musescore can also do this via scaling.
you use a different line spacing. Musescore can also do this, the spacing is configurable.
you change the size of the page margins. Musescore can do this too.
And Musescore also has the possibility to increase or decrease the layout stretch with the '{' and '}' keys. Word processing cannot do this.
Actually, word processing does do the equivalent of the layout stretch. In Word, it's Format / Font / Character spacing. Other word processing apps have equivalent commands. ... I should say that I've never seen one without it. :-)
Nonetheless, I agree that OP's suggested "Fit to Page(s)" function probably would be either too complicated to work, or would work fine ... to get a crappy result that would then require much adjustment 'by hand'. Just as it is in word processing.
Comments
See https://musescore.org/en/handbook/4/formatting
In reply to See https://musescore.org/en… by SteveBlower
In page settings, you have to keep adjusting it incrimentaly until you get something that may or may not fill the page neatly, which I find a little tedious. Same with style/page. It would be nice if there was a "fit to page(s)" function. Thanks.
In reply to In page settings, you have… by LL8on
Score and part layout usually requires a number of compromises, including for example juggling settings to a) evenly space measures and systems, b) avoid awkward page turns, c) avoid "orphan" measures at the start or end of repeats, d) avoid a marking below one system forcing a wide distance to avoid a marking above the next system, e) minimise the number of pages, f) maintain legibility. Often only some of those objectives can be realised and deciding which ones have to give is a matter of context and taste. Automating the decisions will be difficult to say the least and the results unlikely to be to everyone's taste.
In reply to In page settings, you have… by LL8on
> It would be nice if there was a "fit to page(s)" function.
Is there a similar function in a word processing program, for example? No! What do you do there then?
In reply to > It would be nice if there… by HildeK
Actually, word processing does do the equivalent of the layout stretch. In Word, it's Format / Font / Character spacing. Other word processing apps have equivalent commands. ... I should say that I've never seen one without it. :-)
Nonetheless, I agree that OP's suggested "Fit to Page(s)" function probably would be either too complicated to work, or would work fine ... to get a crappy result that would then require much adjustment 'by hand'. Just as it is in word processing.