Petaluma Right (end) Winged Repeat Sign Placement Issue
When using the Petaluma font the right (end) winged repeat isn't placed at the very end of the last measure in a system. (Left (start) winged repeat sign seems to work fine with this font.)
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Petaluma Winged Repeat Issue.mscz | 6.41 KB |
| Petaluma Winged Repeat Issue.pdf | 62.26 KB |
Comments
Please report at https://github.com/steinbergmedia/petaluma/issues, we're just taking the font from there
In reply to Please report at https:/… by Jojo-Schmitz
DONE. Thank you!
In reply to Will do. Thank you! by James T. Bartlett
Thanks for https://github.com/steinbergmedia/petaluma/issues/14 ;-)
It does look right in the current MuseScore 4 development version, if changed away from Petaluma and back to it again.
In 3.6.2 other font are affechted too, just not as badly. Only Leland and Emmentaler are not.
So it looks to be a MuseScore 3.x issue after all?
It does also look better, but not totally good in the artifacts from https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/9000 (sort of a development build for a 3.7), not sure which change there makes the difference, and what to change further to have it look completly right
In reply to It does look right in the… by Jojo-Schmitz
Personally, I can wait for 4.0…it’s not the end of the world. And it must be trivial given that no one has reported it until now. Thank you!
In reply to Personally, I can wait for 4… by James T. Bartlett
Up to (and including) 3.6.1 there was a worse issue with those wings, see #315238: Petaluma wings on End-Repeat barline misplaced
In reply to Up to 3.6.1 there was a… by Jojo-Schmitz
Jojo-
Indeed your PDF example above shows the Petaluma end-repeat displayed perfectly and I was under the impression that this issue in 3.6.2 would be fixed in MuseScore 4.0. However, I tried creating some new lead sheets in the Petaluma font with MS 4.0.0 (revision 5485621) and the end-repeat is not being placed correctly.
In reply to Jojo- Indeed your PDF… by James T. Bartlett
Oh wonderful (not), so it seems a 3.6.2 fix is missing in 4.0
Although that can't really be, the fix is in 3.3.x and the master branch
In reply to Jojo- Indeed your PDF… by James T. Bartlett
The PDF looks OK to me, wing wise
In reply to The PDF looks OK to me, wing… by Jojo-Schmitz
Yes, the wing object itself is perfect. But when you zoom in you can still see the staff poking out just a bit beyond it.
In reply to Yes, the wing object itself… by James T. Bartlett
Hmm right, need to investigate further