formatting for parenthetic sus chords

• Nov 25, 2023 - 23:15

I am trying to input an Fmi(sus2) chord using the musejazz font (jazz style). It superscripts the parethesis and the "2", but not the "sus" so it looks poorly formatted. There seems to be no way to move individual items in a chord symbol. I could just put a space between "mi" and "sus2", but it still superscripts the 2 so that doesn't look great either. If I don't use parenthesis then I have the odd looking "misus2" (and the 2 is still superscripted.

My only workaround so far is just to add the chord symbol as staff text and format the text.

Attachment Size
Screenshot 2023-11-25 155014.png 10.16 KB

Comments

In reply to by AndreasKågedal

I guess it is an option, I am not a theory whiz, so not sure if indicating minor might be important for other interpretation in say a lead sheet where improv might be going on?? I am clueless here as I don't improvise! But seems like not including minor might add some confusion (would someone then presume it might be a dominant chord ... I mean I guess there is no 7 indicated in this particular case, In fact, since I was notating someone else's score and they included the minor designation, so to be true to the original I wanted to include the minor designation. But thanks for the tip.

In reply to by AndreasKågedal

I guess it is an option, I am not a theory whiz, so not sure if indicating minor might be important for other interpretation in say a lead sheet where improv might be going on?? I am clueless here as I don't improvise! But seems like not including minor might add some confusion (would someone then presume it might be a dominant chord ... I mean I guess there is no 7 indicated in this particular case, In fact, since I was notating someone else's score and they included the minor designation, so to be true to the original I wanted to include the minor designation. But thanks for the tip.

In reply to by rothers

That’s one possible interpretation, but not one all musicians would make. Technically speaking, “sus” refers to “suspension”, and traditionally 9-8 suspensions are more common than 2-3. Even if one isn’t making that historical connection, it’s still just not the case that a musician is going to know you mean for them to omit the 3rd unless you say so explicitly. And the fact that he particular chord has the “m” is actually a decent indication they don’t want the third omitted (otherwise, as noted, it would make no sense).

That ambiguity is a big part of why I recommend not using “sus2” but instead being explicit. If you mean the traditional interpretation relating to the 9-8 suspension, write “add2”. If you want the third omitted, write “add2no3”.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.