Enhanced Instrument Limits Modification

• Jan 24, 2024 - 02:40

I'd like to bring up a feature request that I believe could enhance the user experience for many of us. Currently, the instrument limits in Musescore are set to emulate practical orchestration scenarios, ensuring a realistic playback. However, in certain situations, such as during the composition process or when exploring unconventional ideas, it would be immensely helpful to have the ability to modify these limits.

My proposal is to implement a feature in the settings that allows users to toggle or customize instrument limits, ensuring that every written note produces sound, regardless of practical orchestration concerns. This modification would streamline the composition process, making it easier for users to experiment and explore different musical ideas without limitations.

I understand the importance of realistic playback, but having the flexibility to modify these settings would greatly benefit composers working in various styles and genres. It's about striking a balance between realism and creativity.

I appreciate your time and consideration of this feature request. Thank you for your dedication to making Musescore an outstanding platform for musicians and composers.

Comments

• Jan 24, 2024 - 04:00

Personally, while I understand this request, I can't agree. Composers must work within limitations. Why? Well you wouldn't write the same kind of music for a quartet that you would for a full orchestra. Or the other way around. Part of how creative we are shows in how we write for different situations. Limitations don't stifle creativity. They allow it to be more....creative. At least to me.
I don't feel that composing is me against the instruments, and I need instrument freedom. Rather my job is to work in harmony (see what I did there) with whatever combination I have chosen. I don't think composing is freedom to do what I want. Rather, an opportunity caress something meaningful into existence.

Reply

• Jan 24, 2024 - 04:18

Hello Bob.

First of all, composers are supposed to be able to understand the innate capabilities of the instruments without relying on colored notes or MIDI pitch cancellation. If one desires a note to sound digitally, a sound cancellation is a total obstruction to the composition. Producers would know what I'm talking about, as they rely on programs that can be manipulated, and the only limitation is that the program has yet not been mastered. So let's watch out for the fact that one may use a program for diverse purposes.

Obviously, I know MS is designed primarily for live music arrangement, but as its principal sound format is MIDI, we should be able to do different stuff, considering that it has capabilities compatible with DAWs, digital sound design, program sound events, and more. I'm not a purist anymore, but I know how to work with live musicians and sheet music, and MS has been a main tool for me to work for them. But in the meantime, this opinion remains liberal towards the free use of sound for practical purposes only.

Reply

• Jan 24, 2024 - 04:56

I am surprised then, that you are using notation software. Why? When a DAW has always been the choice for working outside the boundaries of notation and pitch. I have nothing against writing whatever and however someone wants. But there are far better tools than notation software to do that.
I know that you are only asking to be able to extend the range of instruments. There are ways to do that. Think about it.

Reply

• Jan 24, 2024 - 07:14

With the instruments from Muse Hub you get more realistic playback but you are not going to get out of range notes because they have not been recorded. With Muse Basic there is almost certainly an instrument that can play just about any note pitch that you want (within reason).

Reply

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.