flag 32nd upbeat too wide
Is there a way to make the flags op the single 32nd not upbeat less wide, I think they are too wide. I can move the notes a bit to make the gap a bit wider but would prefer to have the flag less wide...
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Flag.jpg | 142.48 KB |
Comments
Style / General / Beams / Broken beam minimum length.
EDIT: Elaine Gould, in "Behind Bars" (one fo the definitive references on such matters), recommends these beams the same length as a notehead. Our default seems to match this very well, so I'd say that while you are free to modify this setting to suit your preference, the default is good according to the best standard we have available.
In reply to Style / General / Beams / by Marc Sabatella
Excellent, for me a smaller value looks much better. This is 1.02 in stead of 1.27.
![broken beam.png]( "broken beam.png")
In the beginning of the bar is also a strange problem with the beams of the tenor...
When I move one of the 64th notes to the other system it is solved but I want to divede them like this.
BWV 1002 - All.mscz
In reply to Excellent, for me a smaller by SRH
There are indeed certain extremely complex cases like the one you show where it is very difficult to even come up with a clear set of rules to determine what the correct beaming should be, much less implement it. We do try pretty hard to avoid the "beam corners" you see here, but it already takes a pretty big mess of special cases to handle all the situations we already do. Feel free to submit an official bug report on this one, but I'm not sure how easy it will be to fix without breaking things that currently work well.
In reply to There are indeed certain by Marc Sabatella
On p 316 in "Behind bar" the author advises to add additional beams in cross staff notation in a way that it avoids beam corners, is there a way to choose at which side the additional beams appear?
In reply to On p 316 in "Behind bar" the by SRH
Not currently. It seems at some point we should probably implement some sort of control. Not sure exactly what it would look like or how it would work.
In reply to Not currently. It seems at by Marc Sabatella
It would be nice as the additional beams could be selected independently and then given the possibility to be flipped like as stem etc.