special bar? 4/4 Estrellita
I'm working on Estrellita, 4/4 with ks single flat,
how to re-produce this bar, it seems 5/4 in solo part, but 4/4 obviously in piano part.
pls. teach me how to understand this bar?
thank you very much.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| special-bar.jpg | 23.19 KB |
| special-bar.mscz | 2.39 KB |
Comments
Using voices and hidden rests, I guess?
Or a quarter note with a half note head?
In reply to Using voices and hidden by Jojo-Schmitz
thanks for your reply, besides re-produce the score,
really want to know what's the meaning about.
thank you again.
In reply to thanks for your reply, by dds
I don't know...
In reply to I don't know... by Jojo-Schmitz
thank you very much.
In reply to thank you very much. by dds
the 2nd voice half note break into 2 quarter notes,
the 2nd one play together to the following triplet note(overlapping)
hope it's the real meaning.
In reply to the 2nd voice half note break by dds
that what the voices variant plays at least
I think it's perfectly clear that the Ab minim is a misprint for an Ab crotchet.
In reply to I think it's perfectly clear by ChurchOrganist
'perfectly clear' brilliant ;-)
In reply to 'perfectly clear' brilliant by Jojo-Schmitz
It's playable on violin 3rd position, Ab on D String and E,G on A String if original
overlapping idea intended to.
Heifetz, made music very different. Difficult to know for an ordinary people.
Or it's really misprinted by publisher.
In reply to It's playable on violin 3rd by dds
Even Heifetz would obey the theoretical laws of music: If he'd wanted a bar of 5/4 in the solo part he would have changed the time signature.
It's a misprint - the layout of the bar gives it away.
In reply to Even Heifetz would obey the by ChurchOrganist
I think the point is, it really is a 4/4 bar, but maybe the Ab really was intended to overlap the E (playing them on different strings). Meaning multiple voices are involved, and which case, the editor really should not have hidden the leading half rest in the upper voice or trailing quarter rest in lower, as doing so invites exactly this confusion.
Or it really is a typo :-)