Copyleft

• Oct 28, 2016 - 17:09

I used EUDCEDIT to generate the symbol of copyleft:

ho.png

is it possible to get it accepted in MuseScore?


Comments

In reply to by Marc Sabatella

Ciao Marc, yes sure.
EUDCEDIT is on Windows PC. It allows you to create/edit a character and make it available (on your PC) for text processors.

left.png

But sharing requires that it is present on the other PC. Maybe one day it will be incorporated in my favorite software. Regards.

In reply to by Shoichi

So are you saying this is basically a font editor - software that allows you to create your own font? And you've basically created a font that contains a single characters?

It's certainly possible such a character could be added to one of the fonts we provide. If this an actual standardized character? If so, maybe you could interest the folks who define the SMuFL standard to include it in the definition, and then it would automatically get added to Bravura Text. Or maybe you could interest the makers of FreeSerif et al to include it.

Not sure how we could provide it if it isn't part of one of the fonts we use.

In reply to by Shoichi

Nevertheless, you should bear in mind that only “copyright” has any legal standing ... and the same thing goes for its symbol.

If you do decide to use this (legally unrecognized) symbol, I suggest that you also accompany it with legally recognized words such as (under U.S. law ...) Copr.   The law expressly authorizes the use of these abbreviations, in addition to the circle-right-facing-C symbol, and doesn’t care which one(s) you use as long as you do use one.   This fulfills the “notice” requirement.

In the eyes of the law, “Copyleft” is undefined.   Legally, it is a form of Copyright Licensing that you, as a copyright owner, are freely entitled to grant ... calling it under “a cute name” for your own amusement.   But, in order to be able to grant any rights at all, you should follow all the legal copyright requirements of your applicable system of law.   Formally register your work.   (In the USA, that costs $35.00 ... for a “collection” of as many works as you may wish to register at the same time for one fee.   See http://www.copyright.gov.)

(The notion of a “collection” is simply a cost-and-paperwork saver.   Protection applies equally and severally to each work, no matter how it was registered.)

Next, instead of relying upon a symbol that the reader might or might not understand (or even notice ...), state the terms (or, refer to an existing license agreement document) under which you are granting rights under your copyright.   Make it absolutely clear to them, without belaboring the point obnoxiously, what they may and may not do.   Don’t assume that they will even notice that the “C” is reversed, let alone know what you intend it to mean.   Kindly show them the courtesy of removing all doubt.

“Copyright” is simply a body of law that defines and secures your rights.   It says that you are therefore allowed to “grant” those rights, but it never says exactly how you must do it.   Licensure can be restrictive or permissive, or even both at the same time.   As the legally-recognized owner, it is up to you, and the full power of law-enforcement will, if need be, come to your aid.

By formally securing and registering your rights, you also reduce the potential legal liability of any subsequent user of your work.   (Who can and should register his “derivative work,” referencing your copyright-certificate number in his application to document the chain of ownership claims and provenance.)   No third-party person will be able to come out of the woodwork just to cause trouble (as they sometimes do ...), because the “chain of title” is clear and formal, as any judge can plainly see.   Given the draconian power of copyright law, and therefore the expense of dealing with it, this “minding your P’s and Q’s” is important for everyone ... and well worth a measly $35.00.

In reply to by mrobinson

Thanks for the the detailed deepening. My question, as in other circumstances, tended to figure out how to implement the availability of symbols or text characters accompanying MuseScore.
It is understood that the legal aspects remain under the laws of their respective countries (globally there isn't still great homogeneity).
For those interested I report: http://www.safecreative.org/ and http://www.bmi.com/ for quite simplified registration procedures (Not 'burotiche').
Copyright relating to music (and other creative works) is a recurring argument and rather 'thorny', tough especially for young site users. Clarifications by those who have more experience are welcome. Regards

In reply to by Shoichi

Clarifications by those who have more experience are welcome
Sure, but if possible not in this forum. I believe it's good to keep discussions focused. Clarifications on legal matters should be asked to a lawyer.
Note that there is NO requirement to register copyright in the USA and in most countries since they sign the Berne Convention. One can use his $35 for something more useful (like a donation to a free software or wikipedia?)

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.