RepeatList should use measureIndex instead of measure->no()
Having a jump marker (such as Fine) in a measure where the consecutive measure has measure number -1 offset will result in the second measure being included into the jump when it shouldn't.
Report, start of analysis and example score in https://musescore.org/en/node/285671
This score is affected by using
measureIndex() should be used. See
index() should work as well and be a little more performant.
Likely this change should happen for the whole of the RepeatList class internal logic…