How-to: Compile MuseScore 2 on Ubuntu 14.10

• Sep 20, 2014 - 06:46

Hi,

I added a page about compiling MuseScore 2 on Ubuntu 14.10. See here:

[[nodetitle:Compile instructions (Ubuntu 14.10) - Git]]

Thanks.


Comments

In reply to by ChurchOrganist

I think all packages about Qt needed to run MuseScore are installed with this command on the tutorial (tested on Ubuntu MATE and Xubuntu):

sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev qtbase5-dev qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools qtquick1-5-dev qtscript5-dev libqt5xmlpatterns5-dev libqt5svg5-dev libqt5webkit5-dev

Each package has its own dependencies, so more packages are installed.

In reply to by jpfle

on Mint17 I compile daily but the following (above listed) dependencies are not installed

qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools qtquick1-5-dev qtscript5-dev libqt5xmlpatterns5-dev libqt5svg5-dev libqt5webkit5-dev

however there is a qt5 in my home, within which these files don't show.

In reply to by robert leleu

It's normal that these files don't appear in your Qt 5 local installation, because they are just packages that will install files. For example, the package libqt5xmlpatterns5-dev will install about 30-40 files like /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtXmlPatterns/QAbstractMessageHandler. The package qttools5-dev-tools will install files like /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/bin/lrelease.

On Ubuntu 14.10, it's no longer necessary to download Qt from the official website and change the value of the variable $PATH, because it's in the repositories.

In reply to by ChurchOrganist

I've just tested the tutorial on Ubuntu 14.10, Ubuntu MATE 14.10, Ubuntu Studio 14.10, Kubuntu 14.10 and Xubuntu 14.10, and it works fine.

Qt 5.3 is now on the default repositories of 14.10, used by all flavors of Ubuntu:

The difference between the flavors are in the set of packages installed. However, all flavors of Ubuntu use the same repository for downloading updates, so the same set of packages is available regardless of which flavor you have installed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFlavors

@jpfleury Thank you so much for your writing. I modified it a bit to not mention 2.0 but just the development version. I also removed the sentence when you prompted the user to delete the source code after compilation since I hope she will never do that but instead pull and recompile often or even better read the Git Workflow page and start contributing.
Thanks again.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.