some things we want back in MS 4

I am really hyped about MS 4 and all in all I see it vastly improving our lives (at least for me that uses it in a daily basis). All that considered, I miss some features from MS 3 that I hope will be included in later releases and fixes.

1. Being able to adjust the width of palletes, properties and generally all panels.

2. All the placement of panels and dimensions should be saved in the Workplace you've introduced in MS 4

3. Being able to drag elements from the score into our custom palletes.

4. Being able to "Set" any parameter we want to the style properties. In MS 3 there was a capital S next to settings such as line thickness in inspector. Line thickness hasn't this option in MS 4.

5. Being able to change a text properties. e.g. write a custom text that can enable the pizz. midi channel in violins. I know you've made custom texts that do that for many instruments (guitar, strings) but I personally want the freedom to do it myself and not copy paste from palletes.

6. Being able to adjust the "stacking order" of elements in the score. I mean I get it that it is not used by most people, so you might want to consider having a more advanced view mode for things like this because they are key to professional and detailed engraving.

7. Not seeing the background of the elements when dragged and dropped in the score from palletes (purely aesthetical)

8. Having a dark theme with black elements and white background in the palletes (not inverted) as an option.

Now some bugs that I observed and ought to be fixed in the future.

1. I customised my palletes and now I opened the app again proportions & scaling in the palletes are all over the place.

2. if you put many volta lines that do not make sense logically, musescore is confused and doesn't even play the measure that is selected.

To clarify myself, I do not consider MS 4 worse than 3. It is difficult to describe how big of an overhaul MS 4 really is and the impact it has in its users and to have that for free is a divine blessing and only possible thanks to the wonderful team developing and supporting it.
From this point onward I see no reason for musescore not being the first choice for a music engraving software. On a final thought I want to add that since more and more composers (myself included), and many that self-publish work with musescore, I think that the next big improvement and the only thing that musescore is lacking a lot in is anything that has to do with contemporary notation (pictorial scores, custom curves, lines, arrow lines that are customisable, cluster notation, and many more that are achieved only with "tricks").
Keep up the amazing work musescore team & musescore community.