Beaming disparity between score and individual parts
Reported version
4.0
Type
Functional
Frequency
Once
Severity
S4 - Minor
Reproducibility
Randomly
Status
by design
Regression
No
Workaround
No
Project
I am seeing a disparity between how notes are beamed on a grand staff for marimba on the score and in the separate part. If you look on the score m85 that is the preferred beaming (above the treble clef staff). On the individual part the beaming is placed in the middle.
- In general, is there a shortcut to moving the beams to above the upper staff when notes are split cross staff?
- Does this have to be done manually on each part?
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Yamanashi Blues - M4 - 011623 - 01.mscz | 354.97 KB |
| Screen Shot 2023-01-16 at 7.40.11 PM.png | 264.24 KB |
| Screen Shot 2023-01-16 at 7.40.31 PM.png | 199.76 KB |
Comments
Update: I keep having to fix the same issue over and over again. When I re-generate the part, the beaming is wrong and then it changes the corrected beaming in the score. The constant having to to re-fix stuff is becoming very frustrating.
Now add to this issue that note that I previously moved to the bass clef are switching to ledger lines below the treble clef. M47
This measure should be the same as other occurrences because I copied and pasted when first writing the score.
See my comments lesehwere - it is by design that manual adjustments are independent, because all sorts of things might different between score and parts making the adjustments made in one place not meaningful. For example in this case, the distance between the staves might differe betwene the score and part due to different page sizes, staff sizes, numebr of staves per page, etc. And thus, the amount of manual adjustment required will likely differ.
In reply to See my comments lesehwere -… by Marc Sabatella
Thank you.