How do I start a new section with a new solo instrument?
I am writing a piece of music for a solo instrument. I use a "Section break" to separate sections of the piece, and change keys.
The first four sections are for a standard concert flute.
The fifth section is for a tenor sax, which is a transposing instrument.
When I change the instrument for the fifth section, it changes it for the entire score, not just the current section.
Is there a way to change the instrument only from the current section forward?
Also, is there a way to save a new instrument definition for use in other compositions? I defined a "G Tenor Saxophlute" (a new transposed instrument).
Comments
To change the instrument mid staff, use https://musescore.org/en/handbook/3/mid-staff-instrument-changes. If it's on the first beat of the section everything will update including the instrument names displayed in the score. You can make the instrument change invisible since it is redundant.
You can make a custom instruments.xml file for new instruments. This is not well documented so you will have to look at the existing instruments.xml as a guide and there is an option in preferences in the Score tab to tell MuseScore where to find it.
In reply to To change the instrument mid… by mike320
Thanks. I had planned to change it to a Tenor Sax, and then customize the instrument to the range and transposition of a G Tenor Saxophlute.
But this interface does not give me that option, so I will have to look into the instruments.xml file to first define the instrument.
With your information, I think that I can do what I want to do.
In reply to To change the instrument mid… by mike320
So far, here is my instrument definition (with braces substituted for angle brackets):
I do not know what to put for the pitch ranges, transpose specs, or the "program value".
Below is the UI version of my instrument definition:
Thanks in advance for your help.
David D.
In reply to So far, here is my… by dddiam
Perhaps Jojo-Schmidt will be able to help with this when he wakes up in the next couple of hours.
In reply to Perhaps Jojo-Schmidt will be… by mike320
Jojo-Schmitz please ;-)
In reply to Jojo-Schmitz please ;-) by Jojo-Schmitz
Sorry I didn't look to make sure I spelled it correctly. I usually just call you Jojo so I don't have to remember your last name.
In reply to Sorry I didn't look to make… by mike320
Schmidt and Schmitz (and some more variations) are very common names over here. Schmitz is 14 pages in Düsseldorf's Telefone book, more than double in Cologne's ;-)
In reply to So far, here is my… by dddiam
When in doubt, try it out. I think it uses the notes in sounding pitch
In reply to When in doubt, try it out. I… by Jojo-Schmitz
Thank you for the annotations and reference link.
I am making progress, and I will post my final definition when everything works.
David
In reply to Thank you for the… by dddiam
BTW, How does one post a block of XML like this. I had to change the angle brackets to braces for it to display properly in my post.
In reply to BTW, How does one post a… by dddiam
Enclose in <xml>...</xml>
In reply to Enclose in >xml<...>/xml< by Jojo-Schmitz
Thanks. Now I will be able to post my next XML instrument version.
BTW, Saxophlute is not a typo.
The inventor and manufacturer, Erik, at http://eriktheflutemaker.com calls it an "All-Terrain G Tenor Saxophone". It has a saxophone mouthpiece & reed, and sounds exactly like a saxophone. It it has a one-octave range.
My friends are the ones that call it a "Saxophlulte".
There are videos and soundtracks at http://tinyurl.com/saxophlute.
The All-terrain models are carbon fiber. Erik also makes a bamboo version.
David
In reply to Thanks. Now I will be able… by dddiam
So neither Saxophute nor Saxophlulte are typos?
In reply to So neither Saxophute nor… by Jojo-Schmitz
Ooops! You are right. I guess that we will just have to invent and build a saxophute ;-)
Thanks for clarifying. One often sees what they meant to write, and it takes another set of eyes to break through the self-hypnosis.
Thanks, Jojo.
David
In reply to Ooops! You are right. I… by dddiam
Been there, done that ;-)
In reply to So far, here is my… by dddiam
I am gradually figuring it out from other instruments.
It appears that the value 60 refers to middle 'C', and that the other numbers are half-steps above or below that.
I think that the transposition settings are just in half-steps, rather than the octaves plus interval shown in the Instrument Properties User Interface.
David
In reply to I am gradually figuring it… by dddiam
You are correct. They are midi number for the pitches.