3.2.3.7635 "m" is not working correctly?
As titled with attached, for the beginning bars by design 1day?
of:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Souvenir d'un lieu cher, Op.42 (Tchaikovsky, Pyotr) 2. Scherzo.mscz | 72.51 KB |
As titled with attached, for the beginning bars by design 1day?
of:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Souvenir d'un lieu cher, Op.42 (Tchaikovsky, Pyotr) 2. Scherzo.mscz | 72.51 KB |
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
You have a tempo in the first measure so it is not included in the multi measure rest, but it should be.
Tempo texts don't normally prevent a measure from being included in multimeasure rests, and that's not the problem here - deleting the tempo doesn't help. The problem is the second measure is not in fact empty, there is content on invisible staves. Not sure exactly why that causes the rest to break rather than not appear at all, but in case, deleting that content would fix it.
If the point of the invisible staves is to see the violin part alone, that's not the correct way to do it. Instead, simply use File / Parts. This generates the parts correctly and turns on multimeasure rests automatically.
In reply to Tempo texts don't normally… by Marc Sabatella
It's the "pp" in the first bar of hidden piano causes the problem, del it, and add it to the second or third or fouth bar to test and get expected results.
Now i have to del "pp" in the first bar, add it as hidden in bar 4, and set the velcocitys of the frist three bars to 33 as user. regretting that there is no instruction at the begginging for pianist.
Used parts before, never never again. they simply do not sync/mirror with each other. the only easyist way is to hide.
In reply to It's the "pp" in the first… by Xianyue賢越
and again "{" is not working for this "m"ed three bars.
In reply to and again "{" is not working… by Xianyue賢越
As mentioned before, sometimes if a measure is already at its minimum unstretched size, you will instead need to increase stretch of other measures.
In reply to It's the "pp" in the first… by Xianyue賢越
Not sure what went wrong for you with parts when you first tried to figure them out, but this is exactly what the facility is designed for and it's a much simpler way of working. I would urge you to try again and learn to use them correctly. Feel free to ask for help if you encounter problems.
In reply to Not sure what went wrong for… by Marc Sabatella
BD1D, Thanks