Playback: tied trills

• Dec 1, 2023 - 16:15

Chromebook/Linux
I saw something mentioned 5+ years ago which may be similar. Since it may still be the same thing I thought I would bring it up, again.

Tied notes over multiple measures that are trills or a roll for percussion, if you use the trill sign(s), sound for the first measure, then at least the second measure has no sound. Some occurrences do not sound the third measure and some do. Very irregular.

It was suggested to just leave the ties off and that works ok in MS, but not at all with real performers. And in a large score with multiple times happening it would be very difficult to clear and reaccert the ties over 100+ pages. I hope mentioning this again might bring it back into focus.


Comments

I've used a couple different notation programs. Including Sibelius. What I learned long ago is that sometimes I needed two scores. One for playback. Because I have to do all kinds of un-natural things to get the playback I want. And a score I would hand to real players.
Who knows when the trill problem will be fixed. And it isn't the only playback problem by any means.

In reply to by bobjp

Bobjp
You are probably right. I, though have enough trouble keeping tabs on one set of files, let alone two! Between what I try to do and what MS does that I was not expecting, I get in serious trouble. I may be there from something the probgram did yesterday? Will not know for sure till I start work next week. Too 'concerned' to follow up before I quit. Will hope for the best....expect the worst!
I also accidentally did something that made the tied trills problem disappear. Probably just another version of the problem. Will experiment further next time I open. Let you know what I find then.
Thanks for the thoughts

In reply to by R. L. F.

Actually my old brain remembered something. I don't know how you are entering trills, but I just tried this and it worked for me. at least.
On a flute part, I tied three whole notes together. I used the tr with the trill line after it. I selected the line and dragged the end of it to cover all three measures. The trill played correctly.

In reply to by bobjp

I tried your way. Sorry no luck. I forgot to ask if you are using chromebook/linux. I do think some features work slightly different.
I could not get things to work as I thought I did last week. No surprise there. And the feature works somewhat differently 2/4, 3/4, 4/4. One measure drops one time sign, two meas another then a fourth plays again, in another. Nothing consistent. Very frustrating.
I did run into two ways that seemed to always work, at least this time! Neither is perfect or truly correct.

One; just fill the measures with correct note, then trill with squiggly line and pull to end of trilled notes. They all played. No tied lines. Not great, but did play. Second; slightly better, just use slur lines, then trill with squiggly line and pull over all trilled notes. It 'looks' better and sounds fine. The slur lines just raise higher over the notes.
Since you and I seem to be only ones interested :) I am sure it is why it has not been corrected, yet!!
Thanks for the comment

In reply to by bobjp

Guess they were before I posted. Have not noticed any now. When I looked before I posted, the thread I saw was years old, as I mentioned. I shall keep experimenting with what I have come across. Sorry your suggestion did not work for me. It sounded very useful.

In reply to by R. L. F.

Come to think of it, I'm not sure if I would have a problem with no ties. If I was playing a part that had three whole notes that where not tied but had a trill line over them, I would just trill through all three. Much like I would if the notes where not all the same pitch.

In reply to by bobjp

That is certainly a possibility, but I would be concerned a performer might/would think you want a new attack at beginning of each measure with the trill continuing. Hard to know. Some kind of tie/slur seems the safer way of doing it. Obviously tie!

In reply to by bobjp

Maybe yes...maybe no. I think a conscientious performer reading the score might think you want the trill to continue, but you want an attack at each measure where there was no 'expected' tie. Just my thought of what might be, if what was normal was not there? But yes, could go either way.

In reply to by Jm6stringer

Sorry, nothing shows for me with your link. If there are no ties that is fine. I would be very sure Sousa was conducting the first performance(s) and would have expressed how he was meaning for it to be played. And now there are Many years of tradition from that first performance. I on the otherhand would not have either occurring! The ties will show on the score and that is the important element! Thanks for the thought

In reply to by R. L. F.

In the score he posted, there is a trill that lasts for four measures. There are no ties. Just a trill line over all the notes. We don't have the original score. Who knows how it was written. Different publishers do things differently. You need to do what you think is right for you.
Just as an aside. Mendelssohn used to go sit under a tree and on a blank page scratch out his own staff paper and scribble out a symphony. We have some of those originals. Then he would hand those to his assistants to write out legible copies. Who knows how accurate they were. Did the composer double check? Would he remember every detail?

In reply to by bobjp

I thought it was something like that. As I said, tooo many years of tradition and the composer leading first performances for an accurate comparison. Most likely it was how it was written.
I, many times over the years have wished I had copiest to make good copies. As for sitting under a tree, I have too many apples falling on my head. As did some Newton fellow! Thanks for the comments

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.