Position and angle of beam and sub-beam
These could be connected.
1. Open attached score 1 (produced in 1.3).
LilyPond 2.18.2:
MuseScore:
Discussion: After improvements were made to another beam issue (#41761: Beam angle too sharp), I started looking at scores, and my attention was drawn to the sub-beam in one. In this example, I refer to those in beats 2 and 4, I suppose (the repetition of notes was in order to reproduce).
I don't know of conventions, but maybe for this example anyway, there should be a minimum length between the stems, which could equate to the length of two noteheads? It would borrow the rule stated in page 17 of 'Behind Bars' for sub-beams themselves: "These inner beams are the length of a notehead:" I could wrong, however. At first sight, it looked as if it was too long in MuseScore, but probably not.
-----
1. Open attached score 2 (produced in the same nightly).
LilyPond 2.18.2:
MuseScore:
Discussion: You may see similar issues with score 1, but the focus here is the height of the beam and sub-beam. Are we doing anything that breaks conventions?
Using MuseScore 2.0 Nightly Build 0ba6a8b - Mac 10.7.5.
Comments
I'd recommend reading http://blog.steinberg.net/2015/03/development-diary-part-10/#more-928, which coincidentally was posted right while we were working on this.
As you can see from the comments and examples, there is no one right / wrong answer for this (same could be said for many aspects of music engraving practice).
In reply to I'd recommend reading by Marc Sabatella
I'm willing to bypass score 2 for the moment - the thing that probably concerns me most is the issue in score 1, something that doesn't seem to be covered in that blog?
In reply to I'm willing to bypass score 2 by chen lung
There already is a minimum note distance style setting; you are welcome to increase it.
In reply to There already is a minimum by Marc Sabatella
That is true - adjustments to stretch and minimum note distance fix this.
Shouldn't we change something by default so that we don't have to make these adjustments?
In reply to That is true - adjustments to by chen lung
You don't *have* to make any such adjustment. You only need to if for some reason you want to mimic the subjective spacing decisions made by some other software of human engraver.