How to get rid of rests
See the attachment.
The bar rests won't always go away; see red annotations. There's also a quaver rest hidden in the blue annotation!
What to do?
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Capture.JPG | 137.03 KB |
See the attachment.
The bar rests won't always go away; see red annotations. There's also a quaver rest hidden in the blue annotation!
What to do?
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Capture.JPG | 137.03 KB |
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
You can only delete rests from voices other than 1, voice 1 rests (blue if selected), can only get hidden or make invisible. In the upper system you could only make it invisible. In the lower systen are probably voice 1 rests and a result of using voice 3 and 4 instead of 1 and 2, but without seeing the real score this is hard to tell
In reply to You can only delete rests by Jojo-Schmitz
Thank you for replying, JoJo.
Attached is my score, very much work-in-progress!
I shall be grateful for your comments.
In reply to Thank you for replying, by Tom Baldwin
Like this maybe? Lots af swapping voices
In reply to Like this maybe? Lots af by Jojo-Schmitz
Many thanks Jojo. I'm very grateful.
I think what happened is you (or whomever entered this music) made the common msitake of using voices 3 & 4 for the bottom staff. Don't do that. Each staff should begin with voice 1. So, soprano and alto are voices 1 & 2 in the top staff, then tenor and bass are voices 1 & 2 in the bass staff. if there more staves and more parts, each staff would again start over with voice 1. The idea being, voices are for differentiating parts *within a single staff*. If you have only two parts on a particular staff, you need only two voices. The only time you'd need to touch voice 3 is in the cases where you are trying to out *three* parts on a single staff.
In reply to I think what happened is you by Marc Sabatella
You hit the nail on the head Marc! A classic case of not RTFM! Many thanks for posting.
In reply to You hit the nail on the head by Tom Baldwin
Hey Tom, couldn't you just say: "a classic case of NRTFM?" instead?
(a classic case of NJUAFAFTWM!) (don't worry, I have no hope that my acronym will catch on...) :-)