Where (MuseScore version, OS, sample score) doesn't it work and in what way does it fail, i.e. what do you expect it to do and what do you actually get?
I believe it is musescore 1.2. When I say it doesn't work, I mean that a note with a trill symbol above it, when played, simply plays the note without a trill. What I would expect it do to is cause quick alternation between the notated pitch and the one above it, for the length of the note.
By "does not work", I assume you mean, the playback facility doesn't play them [Edit: our posts crossed; I see this indeed what you mean].
True. But they work in the sense that you can create the notation, which is, after all, the primary purpose of MuseScore. Keep in mind, playback is very much secondary in importance - it's mostly just to give you a general idea of how things sound, not to produce perfect performances.
But FWIW, playback is slowly improving, and 2.0 will include more support for ornaments like trills.
Very strange, in http://musescore.org/en/node/18867 (I looked at the second score, 2nd measure on page 4), the trill seem to work, even with MuseScore 1.2, I wonder what trick is behind that?
Ahh, very clever: this are actualy tuplets with hidden notes (and "show invisible" disabled) and modified note heads.
No need to disable "show invisible" - that affects only on screen display within MuseScore. MuseScore.com uses somethi g more like the rendered PDF.
Another trick to get playback of such things should you need it is via extra staves used just for playback. You can then set up up the "regular" score to be a "part" consisting of all but the the playback-only staves, and extract it for printing.
This technique allows you to execute the ornaments without the use of additional votes is actually a "game" (he taught me) of the deceased Jall2 a French musescoriste. That approach is to show not only the power of MuseScore in "musical typography" but also all the possibilities available to those who always ask for more offered by the relevance of its programming.
Jall2 old musician was a publisher / printer having specialized in French writing scores using modern machines since the late 60s. He practically tried and tested virtually all machines and programs created for this ... and was never really satisfied with their results. He considered MuseScore (which he discovered and used since version 0.9.3) as an editor finally on the path to success.
Comments
Where (MuseScore version, OS, sample score) doesn't it work and in what way does it fail, i.e. what do you expect it to do and what do you actually get?
See http://musescore.org/en/developers-handbook/how-write-good-bug-report-s…
In reply to Where (MuseScore version, OS) by Jojo-Schmitz
I believe it is musescore 1.2. When I say it doesn't work, I mean that a note with a trill symbol above it, when played, simply plays the note without a trill. What I would expect it do to is cause quick alternation between the notated pitch and the one above it, for the length of the note.
By "does not work", I assume you mean, the playback facility doesn't play them [Edit: our posts crossed; I see this indeed what you mean].
True. But they work in the sense that you can create the notation, which is, after all, the primary purpose of MuseScore. Keep in mind, playback is very much secondary in importance - it's mostly just to give you a general idea of how things sound, not to produce perfect performances.
But FWIW, playback is slowly improving, and 2.0 will include more support for ornaments like trills.
In reply to By "does not work", I assuem by Marc Sabatella
Thank you. That was very helpful. I look forward to seeing the release of 2.0.
In reply to By "does not work", I assuem by Marc Sabatella
Very strange, in http://musescore.org/en/node/18867 (I looked at the second score, 2nd measure on page 4), the trill seem to work, even with MuseScore 1.2, I wonder what trick is behind that?
Ahh, very clever: this are actualy tuplets with hidden notes (and "show invisible" disabled) and modified note heads.
In reply to Very strange, in by Jojo-Schmitz
No need to disable "show invisible" - that affects only on screen display within MuseScore. MuseScore.com uses somethi g more like the rendered PDF.
Another trick to get playback of such things should you need it is via extra staves used just for playback. You can then set up up the "regular" score to be a "part" consisting of all but the the playback-only staves, and extract it for printing.
In reply to Very strange, in by Jojo-Schmitz
This technique allows you to execute the ornaments without the use of additional votes is actually a "game" (he taught me) of the deceased Jall2 a French musescoriste. That approach is to show not only the power of MuseScore in "musical typography" but also all the possibilities available to those who always ask for more offered by the relevance of its programming.
Jall2 old musician was a publisher / printer having specialized in French writing scores using modern machines since the late 60s. He practically tried and tested virtually all machines and programs created for this ... and was never really satisfied with their results. He considered MuseScore (which he discovered and used since version 0.9.3) as an editor finally on the path to success.
In reply to By "does not work", I assuem by Marc Sabatella
Please take a look at this forum post.
https://musescore.org/en/node/56281
Let me know you feedback about trills and other ornaments.
What I said above.
In reply to Does anybody know when 2.0 may come out? by Kdielol
There's still no better answer than "when it's ready". But my impression is it's getting closer and closer to being ready :-).