Chromatic and Non-Chromatic Percussion

• Sep 5, 2013 - 00:40

Should we rename 'Pitched Percussion' to 'Chromatic Percussion'?

We could then change 'Unpitched Percussion' to 'Non-Chromatic Percussion'.

Using MuseScore 2.0 Nightly Build (0cb6d87) - Mac 10.7.5.


Comments

In reply to by Jojo-Schmitz

If one wants to be technical, I agree many drummers would say that even "non-pitched" percussion instruments can be and often are tuned to specific pitches. This tends to be especially true for hand percussion instruments like bongo, congas, tables, etc. Literally, it's really more about these instruments having "fixed" pitch, although of course that is modifiable by pressure on the head.

But more to the point, these instuments are not *notated* according to their pitches. For example, bongos are notated simply as high and low regardless of the specific pitches they are tuned to. So for better or for worse, the established convention (as indicated by the Wikipedia article, also any number of booms on arranging or orchestration etc) use the terms "pitched" and "non-pitched" (or similar words to that effect) pretty universally. "Definite pitch"and "indefinite pitch" are common alternatives here.

In reply to by chen lung

Still, that's a definite minority. Finale and Sibelius, both use "pitched", as do virtually all books and other references on the subject.

And FWIW, "chromatic" is at least as technically inaccurate for the instruments in the "pitched" category as "non-pitched" is for bongos. Many of the instruments in the "pitched" category are not in fact chromatic at all, but in fact can only play a limited range of pitches (eg, diatonic, pentatonic).

So both sets of terms are technically inaccurate. But there can be no possible question that the established convention in the industry and the literature is to refer to pitched versus otherwise. Finale, Sibelius, all the major books on orchestration, etc.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.