Exporting parts

• Nov 8, 2019 - 12:51

Add to the handbook about how to fix the export feature if grayed out.

Remove the export completion message. Unneeded. Would be nice to have an option to open the exported PDF's automatically.


Comments

Add to the handbook about how to fix the export feature if grayed out.
You mean, add to the handbook that in order to export a file you have to open it first? That seems rather obvious to me, so perhaps I'm not understanding your scenario here.

Remove the export completion message. Unneeded
This was added explicitly on request for those export types that take a bit more time (such as audio exports) as some people tried to open the resulting file before exporting was finished.

Would be nice to have an option to open the exported PDF's automatically.
This could be a good suggestion, but I'd hate it when running in batch-convert mode personally. It's likely also very OS-dependant so it might be not as simple to implement.

In reply to by jeetee

You need to generate the parts in File>Parts first. I could not find that in the manual and is not obvious. However, this is a great feature. Just need the right documentation.

Regarding the message, thanks for explaining that to me. Two workarounds. Omit it for PDF's or display for a short time before closing.

Opening PDF's. I have a love/hate relationship with this since sometimes I want to open them automatically and other times not. The idea is to give it as an option. I suspect you can pass this to the actual PDF generator.

In reply to by Bob Silverstein

Apologies.. I've read the contents of your message but missed the title; thus not realizing you were talking about Export Parts instead of the generic Export of the score.

I indeed would favor some kind of message ticker for successful export.
Perhaps it's worth putting both request (export message & open PDF after export) as entries into the issue tracker. Use S5 - Suggestion for severity and leave all other fields at their default values.

In reply to by mike320

Gray, grey, gray, grey.... I think the original addition to the handbook was neither but a misspelling. I know the across-the-pond variations and would not have corrected them. I guess I should recognize/recognise that I should apologize/apologise for creating any confusion. I should have organised/organized my thoughts better.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.