Augm. dot incorrect setting
Augm. dot is missing when two voices are overlapping each other. Here all notes are entered as dotted.
The setting for Voice2 when framing Voice1 should be edited here.
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
Augm. dot is not really missing. There is an overlapping of the two dots of the A voice 2 and D voice1. In Inspector, you may observe there is legitimate positions for the dot: Top, Bottom (plus Auto)
![Dot.jpg]( "Dot.jpg")
So, in this case, select the D voice 1, and select position "Bottom" (or, if other similar cases into the score, select the chord, or if more, depending the context, Select All (Ctrl + A) -> Notes (bottom right page) -> Select "Bottom", section Dot position.
In reply to Augm. dot is not really by cadiz1
When you print that measure, is a dot missing? The answer is yes.
I didn't notice this setting, but good that it exist. It is fixed now, but it shouldn't it so by default.
In reply to When you print that measure, by edizioneo
"this setting, but good that it exist"
![Sib.jpg]( "Sib.jpg")
![MuseScore.jpg]( "MuseScore.jpg")
![deux voix.jpg]( "deux voix.jpg")
Indeed, good.
I am not an expert of Sibelius (7.5) but I observe this: At the third step (by default), the entry of the D (voice 2) deletes the A (same voice 2)
With MuseScore, you receive an expected result with a simple setting (to know, yes) Maybe another setting in Sibelius that I ignore, possible, don't know.
And by entering in Sib., first, the two notes in Voice 2, then the F in Voice 1, I get this. So, not always better!
EDIT: for the first reply, I wanted to write: "There is an overlapping of the two dots of the A voice 2 and F voice1" , of course.
In reply to When you print that measure, by edizioneo
We generally do try pretty hard to avoid overlapping dots and to foloow the most recommended guidelines for the many special cases necessary to make this happen. But indeed there are a few cases where manual adjustments are necessary, and this is currently one of them.
In reply to We generally do try pretty by Marc Sabatella
That would make this yet another special case that needs to added, then?
In reply to That would make this yet by Isaac Weiss
[ EDITED ]
In principle, it's possible. At some poiint, there are still going to be corner cases where a subjective decision needs to be made.