Divided tuplets?
Are there any way to creat a divided tuplet (also called fragmentary or discontinued tuplets) similar to the one in the attached file?
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Capture.PNG | 13.44 KB |
Are there any way to creat a divided tuplet (also called fragmentary or discontinued tuplets) similar to the one in the attached file?
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Capture.PNG | 13.44 KB |
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
Your image inline:
You mean you'd want a quarter note, followed by the 1st 8th of a triplet, then 2 regular 16th and then the 2nd a 3rd 8th of that triplet (and then the last quarter)?
In reply to [inline:Capture_1.png] You… by Jojo-Schmitz
Yes that exactly what I meant.
In reply to Yes that exactly what I… by anh006465
As far as I can tell this is not possible with MuseScore.
In reply to As far as I can tell this is… by Jojo-Schmitz
Is it possible graphically?
In reply to Is it possible graphically? by anh006465
Sure, but you may be the only one who knows how it should play.
In reply to Sure, but you may be the… by underquark
Thanks a lot, for the playback I can change audio source and add hidden tempo changes to make it match the audio.
In reply to Thanks a lot, for the… by anh006465
No need for tempo changes. Use Voice 1 for show, Voice 2 for playback, Enter quarter note, half note rest, quarter note and turn the half-note rest into a 16:12 tuplet then the notes in the tuplet as duration 4, dotted 4, dotted 4, 4, 4. Make one Voice play, the other not and vice versa for visible.
I think if you asked different people to play this though, you'd get differing results as it's just such an uncommon scenario.
In reply to No need for tempo changes… by underquark
Starting from the 6-let as per Ziya, you can further nest a duplet in a triplet to get still the correct playback in a single voice and keep it all within a single voice. Due to a bug in rendering a triplet bracket over a single note, I resorted to a quadruplet for the first one, with an invisible tie and then used leading space and X-offset to pull in the 2nd (invisible) note and fix up the bracket length.
The rhythm you wrote can also be written as:
and thus its segments are more calculable than the other.
(The lower staff indicates the location of the beats at 4/4 meter.)
In terms of ease of reading, the rhythm will be easier to read as follows: