Shortcuts for direct entry of sharp and flat notes
Hi,
In the Preferences>Shortcuts menu could someone please create the option for the direct entry of sharp and flat notes.
e.g.
Add Note A to Chord: shift + A
Add Note A# to Chord: shift + W
Enter Note A: A
Enter Note A#: W
Insert Note A: ctrl + shift + A
Insert Note A#: ctrl + shift + W
You could make a virtual piano octave with your computer keyboard.
Thanks,
James
Comments
The thing is, it doesn't really work that way even for adding regular notes. Pressing the shortcut for "A" enters an A natural, A flat, or A sharp depending on the current key and state of accidentals. There is no shortcut for entering an A natural. So what you are proposing would actually be a completely different way of entering notes, not just a few more shortcuts. Why not simply use the Piano Keyboard window?
In reply to The thing is, it doesn't by Marc Sabatella
I'm new to music but from what I can tell there is no way to vary between c and c# using the keyboard or mouse, how does one enter a flat at all?
In reply to I'm new to music but from… by Matthew Carven
Welcome, click on the note, use the up/down arrow
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/note-input#move-notes-up-down
In reply to Welcome, click on the note,… by Shoichi
Yup that got it, thanks. There seems to be pitches/semitones i am unable to match with the source piece of music in my head. If i play what I wrote I can only pitch match one note to my humming and the arrow keys are not helping to find the right the right variation on the notes, is it just me or is there a way or possibility that the source was slightly varied from standard some how?
I don't get it, I can't match the notes pitch to the correct 'key' the notes sound like theyre in the wrong key no matter where I move up and down. Must be me hey?
In reply to Yup that got it, thanks… by Matthew Carven
Taking a look at the handbook is always useful.
Try https://musescore.org/en/handbook/synthesizer#change_master_tuning
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/accidentals
In reply to Taking a look at the… by Shoichi
Thanks, got it, used some pitch matching software for android and I was able to get the first part down.
Thanks for all the help just crusing the forum to see if anyone else is having my problem of not being able to copy paste, maybe its the way i'm doing it anyways i'll do some more reading and if I cant sort it i'll start a new thread.
In reply to Thanks, got it, used some… by Matthew Carven
Yes. See also: https://musescore.org/en/handbook/transposition
Remember that you can attach here a score (or an example) that creates problems. Someone can make some suggestions.
In reply to Thanks, got it, used some… by Matthew Carven
You can define short cuts for all of the accidentals as well. Use them immediately after entering the note.
In reply to You can define short cuts… by mike320
Update to the above message about using keyboard shortcuts for accidents:
- In Node Input mode, press the accidental shortcut (e.g. # for #, @ for flat, $ for natural) before entering the target note (the same order it will appear in notation).
- In regular (view) mode, the same shortcuts will add/remove corresponding accidentals.
- To define the accidental, in Preferences / Shortcuts tab, Search for "input", and enter the shortcuts for "Note input: #", "Note input: b", "Note input: natural", etc.
- The shortcuts are related to the Note Input toolbar, so the status of the accidental selection can be observed on the toolbar, as well as directly toggle on the toolbar itself.
In reply to Correction to the above… by olegyk
More strictly an "update" over a "correction" in that 5 years ago (yes, 2017) the behavior of those actions were post-input and not pre-input as they indeed now are in 3.6.2
In reply to More strictly an "update"… by jeetee
Thank you for clarifying -- that make sense. I went for an elaborate response above, sharing my own experience transcribing some music using just the computer keyboard. With the right combination of shortcuts at hand, after some time entering music becomes much like editing a text document.
As a side note: the existing choice of note durations is somewhat less intuitive, than something like
1
for whole,2
for 1/2,4
for 1/4,8
for 1/8,6
for 1/16,3
for 1/32 etc. But it's a good thing that the shortcuts can be re-assigned.In reply to Thank you for clarifying --… by olegyk
FWIW, while the defaults aren't "intuitive" in the sense of being something you'd automatically know without being told, I think you'll find they are actually very efficient, because unlike the system you describe, it means adjacent note values are adjacent on the keyboard. Also, keep in mind, the notion of a "quarter note" is kind of a US-English specific construct. The word for this duration doesn't necessarily involve any connection to the number "4" in British-English, or in a number of other languages. Anyhow, indeed, if you find it efficient to use different shortcuts, you are welcome to do so!
In reply to FWIW, while the defaults… by Marc Sabatella
The problem with sequential numbering is that I can't remember which number (3 or 4 or 5) is a 1/2 or a 1/4 note. I keep poking and then forget again. There's no reference.
Just being curious, what other languages besides British don't name durations based on fractions?
Update: It looks like the Romance European languages use note durations similar to British (probably brought by the Normans), and have common medieval origins. Such as, the crotchet derives from Old Norse krokr meaning "hook", and is related to the handicraft crochet (borrowed from later French). Indeed the 1/4 note looks like a hook. Interestingly, in modern French une croche is a "quaver" or an 1/8 note, while a 1/4 note is une noire (a black one).
In reply to What other languages besides… by olegyk
The way I always remember and teach it is, 4/5/6 for eighth/quarter/half. The middle row of a numeric keypad for the three most common note values. Another way of seeing it: use 5 - the "median" digit - for the note that generally gets the beat. Like a seesaw with 5 (the beat) as the pivot point; notes longer than a beat being larger numbers on one side, notes shorter than a beat being smaller numbers on the other side. It's really quite logical. But logical is different from "intuitive" indeed.
As for what languages don't use a word for "quarter" to describe this note, I don't have a full list, but French, Spanish, and Italian come to mind - they use words relating to the note being "black". Fractions show up in the naming. but not the way they do in US English. For example, what we called a quarter note might be translated as a "half minim" instead in some languages, so if anything, they might want "2" as the shortcut if they were basing them on naming.
In reply to The way I always remember… by Marc Sabatella
Indeed, having been taught music in the UK, I have trouble remembering whether a crotchet is a quarter or an eighth in US terminology and I have to count on my fingers when we get to hemidemisemiquavers.
In reply to Indeed, having been taught… by SteveBlower
And being American, I get crotchet mixed up with crochet, and start looking for yarn.
This is possible through a workaround! https://musescore.org/en/node/8000
Credit goes to Nicolas (https://musescore.org/en/user/4)