How make arpeggio span two staves?
I am trying to make an arpeggio symbol span both staves of a chord as shown here:
If I select the whole chord and double-click the Arpeggio symbol Musescore adds two separate symbols, one for each stave.
I know I can just hide one of these and extend the other so that cosmetically it spans both staves, but I think that on playback the two arpeggios are sounding at the same time, which is not quite the correct effect.
I have tried entering all notes into the lower staff then moving some of them from one staff to the other as per https://musescore.org/en/handbook/cross-staff-beaming but that moves the whole chord.
Is there a way of moving the attachment of the top (or bottom) of the arpeggio so it truly covers all the notes in the chord?
Thanks
Comments
Unfortunately you must use something hidden to make this work.
First - enter the arpeggio the way you want it to look, then select all the notes and uncheck play in the inspector (F8) so they will be silent.
Next you either need to make another staff with the same instrument (recommended if there are a lot of these in the song) or in an unused voice in the lowest clef staff make an arpeggio that uses all the notes from both staffs. If I use another voice I usually just find an empty measure somewhere and put it on the same beat as it would be in the measure I'm working on. Make sure the entire chord for all staffs (usually 2 but could be 3 like an organ) is on the lowest staff with the arpeggio symbol on it. The reason I say to use the lowest staff is that it is easier to build a chord from bottom to top. Now make this work measure invisible by pressing V (at this point you need to make sure Show invisible is checked under the view menu). In the selection filter (F9) uncheck voice 1 and select the measure. You should now have only the voice with your arpeggio selected. Cut that measure. Select the first beat in voice 1 in the measure you want to place the arpeggio and paste it. Make this a habit, because MS will complain if there is a tuplet in the measure and you select the entire measure.
If you make an invisible staff, you will have to make it visible to add notes you want to hear of course, but you can put everything into voice 1 without the need to hide anything. You can even delete all but one staff and simply put the appropriate clef on the staff as needed for arpeggios.
I do the invisible voice option often mainly because I don't like invisible staffs.
In reply to Unfortunately you must use by mike320
This is the best option. It worked perfectly and is simple and straightforward. My arpeggio stretched the clefs and looked normally while still being able to add articulations.
Here is an example in case you're having difficulty figuring it out:
Example_Full_Staff_Arpeggio.mscz
In reply to This is the best option. It… by Kids Kirsch
3 1/2 years later this is still basically my preferred method for proper arpeggio playback. I've learned something to make this work a little better.
I only put the arpeggio on the invisible notes then make that visible and extend it up to look like it belongs in voice 1. When there are accidentals the arpeggio symbols start doing weird auto placements and you end up with extra space when you hide invisible items.
In reply to 3 1/2 years later this is… by mike320
im pretty sure if you have the stems facing the same way the extra space disappears
There's a trick I learned from a forum member regarding arpeggios and time-stretching, and it also applies to cross-staff or two voiced arpeggios, but it takes some calculation.
1) Make an arpeggio for both your F & G clef chords.
2) Hide one of them, the top one, and drag up the bottom one to fit
3) Looks fine, but as you said they don't sound right because they both trigger at the same instance rather than a continuous unfolding
4) Use the piano-roll editor. Find out the OnTime values for the Bass clef chord by right-clicking in the bass clef measure and opening the piano-roll editor. For a 4-tone chord of eighth notes I get the interval of 175 from the first note being 0 and the next being 175, next 350, then 525, so you want the next note, the first note of the treble clef chord to be 525+175, and then the next note of that one to be 525+175+175, etc. You have to right click into the treble clef, or whatever clef you want to be looking at and open the piano roll editor from there. Apparently it doesn't encompass both clefs in one window. One at a time click each note and then type in the numeral value for it in the OnTime form.
I hope this makes sense, I'm tired and might be a little unclear. This is definitely a work around, but it works and doesn't require some extra hidden staves or anything like that; plus, it's good to know these things anyways :)
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
Very good. I like learning new things here.
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
Thank you so much - I had not even used the piano roll editor before now. I had to shorten the offset for each note, as my chord has 9 notes to fit into a quaver, but it works perfectly.
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
Yess, I've been waiting for an excuse to use the Pianoroll. Thank you!
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
Im able to use the piano roll editor to make the arpeggiation continuous on two chords, but when i add a new invisible tempo on the chord to extend it a little bit it shifts the timing on the arpeggio and i have to redo it in the editor. Is there a way in the piano roll editor to slow down the chord/extend it? Or do i need to plan that in advance before editing the arpeggio?
In reply to Im able to use the piano… by [DELETED] 27121121
<deleted>, sorry.
In reply to The piano roll editor is not… by BSG
Any feedback is appreciated.
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
I don't care much how correctly the application plays the arpeggio, yet I have another problem with this solution. Whenever I try this, MuseScore changes the placing of my arpeggios and whole staves automatically and then the arpeggios still won't fit, be they two separate arpeggios one of which is lengthened or one visible and lengthened and one invisible.
In reply to I don't care much how… by lppoja
If I understand correctly, if you select the arpeggio and remove the check from Automatic placement, the problems will go away.
In reply to If I understand correctly,… by mike320
Thanks, that seems to have worked!
In reply to I don't care much how… by lppoja
Perfect! I don't care about it playing; I want the page to look right without space between staves being widened. Thank you so much.
In reply to There's a trick I learned by worldwideweary
While this method does work, I find that it's stretching the note value past the next beat. I have a half note arpeggio on beats 3 and 4. When I use this trick, the note passes into beat 1 of the next measure, messing up pedaling. Any ideas?
In reply to While this method does work,… by Justin M. Bornais
Hey Justin, yeah since that time a plugin (BSG) has been made available and it performs without moving note end lengths.
Try https://musescore.org/en/project/articulation-and-ornamentation-control
and install [Dock Articulate]. Its "On Time %" will be what you'll want to edit.
In reply to Hey Justin, yeah since that… by worldwideweary
Okay, thank you!